That which survives
"Have you been hallucinating lately?"
"No. Should I be?"
"Yes, you should be." - Videodrome
Undoubtedly it's a great consolation for those who presume there's nothing up there, to believe there's nothing down there, either. If it's just a material world, then occult crimes are mere crimes with a bizarre gloss of ritual to kink things up. Even when, as with the Hosanna Church cult, imprints of pentagrams are found on the floor of the "youth hall," and victims and perpetrators alike speak of sex magick and bloody devil worship in black robes, those whose philosophies are not big enough to admit such things happen will still deny them, because they must. Even if they admit that something like these crimes occurred - and that's a big concession for such people - they will strip them of their metaphysical content. It will be said - and I know it, because it's been said many times - that the devil worship of the paedophile ring was nothing but play acting, because there is no such thing as Satanic Ritual Abuse. The reasoning goes round and round like a magician's protective circle.
Still, it's increasingly difficult to tred softly upon the thin crust of modernity with so many eruptions all around us. It's been a hard few months for those who think the world isn't this weird. Maybe harder, even, for those of us who've suspected as much, but have hoped we were wrong. At least that's been my hope.
But one of the implications of the Hosanna Church is that however weird we thought the world, we ought to think again. As the owner of a local Christian bookstore told The New York Times, "if anything like this can happen in a place like Ponchatoula, with all the churches we have, it can happen anywhere." The case of Toledo's Reverend Gerald Robinson, charged in the ritual slaying of a nun and accused of participating in a paedophilic cult of Roman Catholic priests, is another. (I'm sure someone has said, "if it can happen in Toledo, it can happen anywhere.") Then there's yesterday's report of the Italian investigation into a child torture site which counted as patrons three priests; fresh allegations against Spokane's conservative mayor James West ("I want to do to your son what no mother would want to know"); James Guckert who, even if he's not Johnny Gosch, lent credibility to the case for covert paedophile rings by virtue of his own incredible journey to the White House - all of these stories and more are not suggestive of something new happening, but of something that has been going on for a long while right alongside us, which we are only now able to see. Or maybe, able to see again.
There's an interesting recent book by Toyne Newton titled The Dark Worship, that studies the persistence of a Hekate cult in Britain. (Hekate was a wild goddess of the hunt, noted for her strong sorcery, who inspired ecstatic episodes in devotees and typically received sacrifices of dogs.) Newton's investigations led him to Clapham Wood which, interestingly, has been a locus of both occult activity and UFO sightings. (Here, for instance, is an interesting recent account of "black boomerang-shaped objects" over Clapham.)
There's another account here of goings on in the wood by Charles Walker (who makes the mistake of presuming the extraterrestrial hyphothesis of UFOs, and so fails to see their potential occult significance):
Peace was not about to return to the village [following a UFO flap] however, as a new mystery began to unfold. Reports of dogs disappearing in certain parts of Clapham Wood attracted new interest. Dog owners reported that their dogs had wandered off in to the woods and were never seen again. In other cases dogs appeared to go mad in certain parts of the wood, running round in circles and foaming at the mouth. When they were taken out of that particular area they recovered fully.
...
What I became very interested in whilst looking through the various notes relating to Clapham Wood was the reports of the dog disappearances and the fact that a number of people had reported strange feelings whilst walking through certain parts of the wood. Such cases had, although I was not aware of it before, been reported some time prior to the first ufo sightings. Many people had always felt that there was something strange about the wood but they were not quite able to explain it. However having established myself within the group I was able to extract information from the files and visit one or two of the people who had reported their experiences. What I was particularly interested in of course were the experiences which had been reported before the publicity began, and there were quite a few cases.
After taking a call from an anonymous tipster, Walker arranged a meeting in the woods:
Just as I was about to give the whole thing up a voice coming from behind some bushes on my left told me not to attempt to look round. ‘Just listen to what I have to say’, he said. Hearing this voice so suddenly coming from the darkness and silence I had experienced for the past twenty minutes or so made me feel fear again. I was frozen to the spot yet felt like running as fast as I could. What was going to happen? ‘What an idiot’, I said to myself. ‘Why on earth had I let myself in for this?’ After a few seconds of silence the mystery person began to relate information regarding the activities of an occult group in the area. He also indicated that they used a sacrifice regularly at their rituals.
The group was called the Friends of Hekate and they were devoted to the Goddess Hekate whose close association with dogs meant that such creatures were being sacrificed in her honour. He went on to tell how the group, whose activities he said were of a satanic nature, was formed in Sussex and had been using Clapham and the surrounding area for some time. They had been responsible for taking the dogs and would continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The dogs, and occasionally other domestic and farm animals, were sacrificed at their monthly meetings. He also added that they would stop at nothing to protect the identity of their members and the activities of the group.
Continuing his investigations, Walker discovered a huge, crude mural in an unoccupied building abutting the woods, that depicted a devilish, horned figure with sharp talons and forked tail on a background of flames. It appeared to be clutching a religious orb bearing an eight-armed cross and circle. Newton's own research revealed that the Clapham Woods' Friends of Hekate was just a single cell of a network including Winchester, Avebury and London, which used a typically occultic system of grades of initiation to protect the identities and intentions of those in London's inner circle. Also typically, elite figures are counted among its members.
Hekate worship would seem to be both archaic and irrelevant, but ask the dog owners. And if he could be reached, the late Clapham vicar Harry Neal Snelling, whose murder remains unsolved, might have something interesting to add.
We're really talking here about the persistance of archetypes, and those do have power, and have been known to us by many guises. For example, in China Galland's Longing for Darkness, she writes how ancient goddess worship has been transmitted in part through the adoration of Mary, particularly the "Black Madonna." In other words, devotion to Mary may be merely apparent; the Queen of Heaven may have another face. After all, Hekate was said to have three of them.
Similarly, perhaps Marian appearences could be manifestations of something quite apart from the mother of Jesus. It's interesting to read accounts of the first appearance of Mary to four girls in Garabandal, Spain in 1961:
The next night around 6:00 pm, the girls went into ecstacy, or a trance while seeing the Virgin Mary. She appeared to them with two angels, both of which looked exactly like St Michael, and over her right shoulder the children saw a flaming red square with a triangle and an eye in it, and some Oriental writing in it.
A manifestation such as that - yes, that's right: a triangle with a freakin' eye in it - reminds me, I'm embarassed to admit, of Star Trek V, and James Kirk's staring down the supposed deity with the question, "Excuse me - why does God need a spaceship?"
Clapham Woods (copyright Charles Walker) and Garabandal
Hekate was identified with the folklore of the Wild Hunt, which "was a historical phenomenon among all Indo-European peoples." She was often held to lead the charge:
The fundamental premise in all instances is the same: a phantasmal group of huntsmen...in mad pursuit across the skies. Seeing the Wild Hunt was thought to presage some catastrophe such as war or plague, or at best the death of the one who witnessed it. Mortals getting in the path of or following the Hunt could be kidnapped and brought to the land of the dead.
Naturally, today's "Wild Hunt" across the skies conjures, perhaps literally, UFOs. Instead of gods hunting prey, they are thought to be extraterrestrials seeking subjects to "probe." As then, mortals who get in the path of the Hunt risk abduction, and as then, the Hunt is held to prefigure a looming apocalypse.
If we are fast approaching an end of things - not the end of the world, but a catastrophic break in global civilization - perhaps it's not so strange that we should see our culture assume again the characteristics of the beginning of things. Something long hidden revealing its true face. So the Dark Worship reasserts itself, and we're carried again to the land of the dead.
Leonard Cohen called it The Future.
There'll be a breaking of the ancient Western Code.
Your private life will suddenly explode.
There'll be fires, there'll be phantoms on the road,
And the white man dancing.
25 Comments:
"The Wild Hunt" reminds me of the Franz Von Stuck painting The Wild Chase. Von Stuck was Hitler's favorite artist, and historian Robert Waite speculated, in his book The Psychopathic God, that Hitler might have identified with the painting (which was painted in 1889, the year of his birth) and might have chosen his appearance to match the horseman.
great post, as usual jeff. some thoughts, though: the lines between what we consider "good" and "evil" often get pretty blurry. for instance, though a. crowley the person repulses me, he was a brilliant theoretician as far as certain magickal ideas, and a stunningly brilliant man who i gladly reference if need be. or, hec(k)ate, the goddess, may be recognized by some ritual occultists as 'satanic,' is not so considered by a large number of wiccans and pagans who are by and large completely innocent of the more sinister aspects of what we tend to discuss. the idea of hekate as satanic to these folks would be laughable, as satan is nearly a completely christian concept.
the 'fear in the woods' thing is interesting, too, as a manifestation of 'panic,' derived from the ancient nature god pan, who appeared as a hooved, horned, bearded man. arthur machen, who wrote 'the great god pan,' in which a similar encounter in the woods was described, was also involved in the golden dawn, who were many things, but far from overtly satanic.
i guess sometimes it helps me to remember that not all magickians are satanists, and vice-versa ("some of my best friends are ritual magickians!" ;) ).
heh, von stuck happens to be one of my favorite artists, too! the frye museum, a free art museum here in seattle, has a number of von stuck's paintings.
o and one other thing-- i also like to remember that the black & white lodges can appear virtually identical to the untrained eye . . . .
Jeff wrote:
Undoubtedly it's a great consolation for those who presume there's nothing up there, to believe there's nothing down there, either. ... Even when, as with the Hosanna Church cult, imprints of pentagrams are found on the floor of the "youth hall," and victims and perpetrators alike speak of sex magick and bloody devil worship in black robes, those whose philosophies are not big enough to admit such things happen will still deny them, because they must.
Agnostics and atheists certainly needn't deny that "such things happen", any more than opponents of radical right-wing statism must deny that the Bush administration practices woeful statecraft. What makes Bush & Co. dangerous is not that the beliefs behind their statecraft may be true, but simply that they have those beliefs and are prepared to act on them. Likewise for the witchcraft discussed in your article.
Even if they admit that something like these crimes occurred - and that's a big concession for such people - they will strip them of their metaphysical content.
When I reject post-Kantian idealism as false, I don't strip it of its metaphysical content; on the contrary, I reject it precisely on account of its metaphysical content, as there are, in my opinion, compelling reasons to favor another metaphysics. Likewise, I admit without cavil not only that "something like" these crimes occurred, but that precisely these crimes occurred, and would no more "strip them of their metaphysical content" than I would Fichte's benighted philosophy.
jpuma and wolfpauli both do great work keeping the lines of distinction blurred to invisibility.
Maybe it's not time to make sure everybody's comfortable.
Crowley was not only brilliant, he was thoroughly self-interested - the only working definition of evil that isn't vulnerable to relativist dissolution.
Every evil thing that gets named has at its core that selfishness - lust avarice cowardice envy whatever. The self as the only metric for the world and the dimensionless universe.
And there it is.
Satanism is not polarized Christianity it's at least Judeo-Christian, and likely to be, as an organized joint-venture, a product of the same thinktank that built American Christianity out of Old Testament vendetta and used uniforms leftover from the Vespasian catacombs.
-
The simpering glee that surrounds these discussions needs recording. That subliminal cackling noise at the edge of things. Gloating triumph of the unnamed. What I admire most about Jeff's work here is the commitment to vulnerability almost heedless, outside the tract, the stance of taken position without comforting solidity of evidence. It's a brave thing.
-
It would also help greatly to get tight with the undeniable truth of our biological presence. We eat the children of other species, regularly, with gusto. So all that's necessary to get outside the frame of evil in that regard is to have the perpetrators become separate, other, non- or in-human.
Then it's not evil anymore.
The presence among the occult that's observable to the uninitiated - of sex-deviant wannabes and nature-loving pilgrims, the skewed moral compass of oppression's offspring driven marginal and underground - means the relativists will always have the upper hand as long as they're met on ambic property, the platform raised for just that purpose by whatever it is that puts itself before and above what falls behind us. As long as the argument never reaches the outer goal, forward through time to where it ends up merged with the eternal, where it goes, eventually.
It may be more than a sign, or less than a message, that the alphabet, another Judeo-Christian relic with its roots in the dust of Mediterranean intrigue, leads so directly toward an appearance of unified whole.
C D O.
I.
Evil lives. Lived.
Hermes Trismegistus and the Medici.
The devil with a Julius Caesar haircut in last season's three-piece suit. And connections up and down the line.
Juke
Note to Jeff - I really challenge your eschatology. I think your writing is great, but the "It's all connected and leading up to something big" logic strikes me as a misapprehension.
When people are confronted with big effects - wars, cults, abuse - they often look for big causes. It's natural. But such thinking fails to take into account the abritrary nature of the world. Terrible things can happen for no particularly good reason - in fact, they usually do.
That's not to say that we shouldn't keep an eye out for patterns and connected events. But this 'big story' you are weaving around 'elites' and their unified plans strikes me as solipsistic.
But Lessig, being the champion and crusader for intellectual property online and off, has always had a special place in my heart. So when I started to read about his ordeal, I just couldn't help but cry.
Since its founding in 1937, the nonsectarian Boychoir School has gained worldwide renown for producing a choir rivaled only by the more famous one in Vienna; its kids have sung for presidents, popes, and behind Beyonc� at this year's Academy Awards. But now Lessig's client, John Hardwicke, is claiming that in the seventies, the school was a ghoulish sanctuary for the sexual abuse of children. In his two years there, Hardwicke says he was repeatedly molested and raped --induced, as the brief on his behalf to the state supreme court puts it, to "perform virtually every sexual act that could conceivably have been accomplished between two males"-- by the music director, the headmaster, the proctor, and the cook.
This is not the sort of case for which Larry Lessig is famous. At 43, Lessig has built a reputation as the king of Internet law and as the most important next-wave thinker on intellectual property. The author of three influential books on the intersection of law, politics, and digital technology, he's the founder of Creative Commons, an ambitious attempt to forge an alternative to the current copyright regime. According to his mentor, the federal appellate judge Richard Posner, Lessig is "the most distinguished law professor of his generation." He's also a celebrity. On a West Wing episode this winter, he was featured as a character. "The Elvis of cyberlaw" is how Wired has described him.
[ ... ]
During his work on the case, Lessig has been asked more than once by the press if he had experiences at the school similar to Hardwicke’s. And Lessig has replied, “My experiences aren’t what’s at issue here. What’s at issue is what happened to John Hardwicke.”
The answer is appropriate, politic—but it’s not entirely true. For Lessig has told me that he too was abused at the Boychoir School, and by the same music director that Hardwicke claims was one of his abusers. Lessig is by nature a shy, intensely private person. The fact of his abuse is known to almost no one: not the reporters covering the case, not the supreme-court justices. The fact of his abuse isn’t even known to Larry Lessig’s parents.
In taking this case, however, Lessig has cast aside his caution about a secret that haunts him still. And while his passion about his client’s cause is real and visceral, Hardwicke isn’t the only plaintiff here. Lessig is also litigating on behalf of the child he once was.
The article goes on to describe in detail the extent of the rapings and molestation at the hands of several of the school staff. I couldn't put down the article until the end and every single paragraph has great wisdom but the most disturbing quote from the whole piece is the music director's justification for his pedophilia :
“You have to understand,” Hanson replied, “this is essential to producing a great boychoir.” By sexualizing the students, he explained, he was transforming them from innocents into more complicated creatures, enabling them to render choral music in all its sublime passion. “It’s what all great boychoirs do,” Hanson said.
http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/features/12061/index.html#
It's what all great boychoirs do????? what???? well maybe the Hosanna choir needed some discipline!!
I am reminded of a Wm S Burroughs piece: Sailors sailing close to the shore of Tuscany heard a voice cry out over the shore, the sea and sky "the great god Pan is dead" Pan, god of panic: the sudden awareness that everything is alive and significant. The date: December 25 1 AD
Christianity has tried to smother, co-op bury and defeat paganism in all its forms. It can't succeed. We are tied to deeper happenings.
I think we are at risk of falling in some traps here Jeff... Dark (like Evil) and Dark (like dark skin) are not the same thing... I hope u arent falling into racism unconsciously...
1. The greek myth of Demeter tells that she is has three persons
Kore - the young lady - the crescent moon.
Demeter - The Mother - the full moon.
Hecate - the witch - new moon.
2. Yes, a face of the Goddess is the caring mother: like Mary and Isis, but another one is the angry woman, like Kali and Cibeles. Cibeles, the most famous Goddess in the Mediterranean area never submited to a man God for instance. She arrived to Greece at the 7th century b.C but the Hitites devoted to her their capital, Bogaskoi.
3. The dark skin Goddess is everywhere - from Tonantzin with the the Aztecs, to Tara in the Himalayas, to Mary in Poland, to Isis in Egypt... and that figure is one of protection. For instance, the great Goddess of Mexico now is the Virgin Mary of Guadalupe, who is dark skinned and pregnant. She "appeared" at the same place where the old Tonantzin did. Her day is December 12th, a huge day in Mexico. 1212, see the 2 at the inverse and you can read the name of an ancient Egyptian Goddess waiting to give birth. So, who is her? Everyone. Tonantzin, Mary and Isis, and nobody cares...
4. Rituals to the Goddesses are not new - for the white and black ones. The difference is just one: the internet.
5. Interesting that you did choose this issue on Mary Magdalene ´s day.
I certainly don't mean to imply Darkness = Evil. To me, it's more evocative of the hidden, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Certainly China Gallant's Longing for Darkness finds a lot of postive power in the black Madonnas, as do millions of others, and I'm not about to deny their experience. Perhaps I should have taken more time with the post to ensure it had that nuance.
Thank you to both Alfredo and Jeff about clarifing the darkness and the black madonna or Hekate. To use Jung's terms, I see Hekate as the shadow that we (especially women) deny all the time. She is like the Hindu Kali and her purpose to destroy illusion about ourselves mostly. When she destroys one's ego, which any cutting remark will do, we are left with what we are and get to choose our reaction. Sometimes that is pretty scary. But, she is also a liberator. This stuff about sacrificing dogs is a perversion. Dogs being the loyal beings they are represent only sacrificing the attachment to the ego and what one presents to the external world. Anyway this is not dogma, but my opinion and my conclusion after studying and reflecting.
anonymous wrote:
jpuma and wolfpauli both do great work keeping the lines of distinction blurred to invisibility.
Was your post an attempt to make "the lines of distinction" more visible? Perhaps, in a less dithyrambic moment, you'll enlighten me as to what distinction(s) you suspect I blurred.
Jeff spoke of "those who presume there's nothing up there". It's just possible he meant those who reckon the stratosphere a vacuum, but I took him -- nearer to his intention, I hope -- to mean those who do not believe in God. He then proceeded, as noted in my post, to make a captious inference, something we've all done, and more than once. Since the inference would allow one to prove the existence of God from the existence of any religious or occult practice, or indeed, prove the existence of any entity (phlogiston, the capital of the sun, etc.) from the existence of beliefs "about" it, the point shouldn't have been lost on someone, such as yourself, who professes opinions against "relativism".
Obviously you write about a great deal more than politics, but politics/parapolitics is what first drew me to your site, and I am a materialist as far as politics are concerned. The line I personally draw is that no socio-political elites, whether cultists or otherwise, draw their earthly power from occult means. Earthly power comes from the ownership of weapons, trade networks and media conglomerates, not as a gift or trust from any extradimensional entity. IMO that's just how things work down here in the lower dimensions. That probably makes me a pessimist.
Why are we (or at least an awful lot of us) so surprised when its the local mayor/doctor/judge/policeman/teacher/pastor named in a pedo-cult scandal? This is as old as history; the backroom secret of the boys' club. When my dad was a boy, it was well known that the local jesuit priest was a pederast. At my own school, the English teacher was a pederast who recruited boys into a Christian youth organisation called the Crusaders. Favored members got invited to camp, and sleepovers at Mr TP's house. This was all well known, at least among the boys.
I have a suspicion that the secret at the core of EVERY secret society is pedophile sex. And I certainly include the Church of Rome - this, too, is well known.
And what's that, in another post, about people who pay 10 thousand bucks for sex with a child? What kind of person would that be? A rich one. The rich and the powerful have always been the worst behaved, but they're just "us" - with the means to do what maybe we'd do if we lost all sense of right and wrong in the quest for personal thrills and power.
Jiminy Cricket is a guardian angel.
The piece on Hekate contained a phrase which seemed vaguely familiar to me: "The ceremony of the opening of the mouth." I Googled it up ... guess which other organization has a ceremony by that name.
[The selection of] cardinals takes place in a secret consistory, during which those actually resident in Rome are informed of their nomination. In the afternoon of the same day the newly-created cardinals meet in the pope's apartments ...
The "red hat" is given in the next public consistory after they have taken the customary oath. At the beginning of the next secret consistory takes place the ceremony known as the "opening of the mouth" (aperitio oris), and at the close of the same consistory the "closing of the mouth" (clausura oris), symbolizing their duties to keep the secrets of their office and to give wise counsel to the pope.
(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03333b.htm)
There is definitely a syncretistic recognition of much of this symbolism. We live near the Shrine of Czestochowa in Doylestown, PA -- named after a similar shrine in Poland -- where there is a black madonna.
Some years ago, there was an article in the local paper about the shrine having problems with voodoo practitioners who identified the black madonna with one of their own deities and were regularly showing up and wishing to make what they considered appropriate offerings.
As so often in these matters, I had the feeling that the voodoo worshippers probably had a better grasp of the situation than the Catholic fathers who ran the shrine.
Albion, "earthly power" is social influence. Guns, money, and information can accent that influence, but they are not its source. Jesus was dirt-poor. Ghandi never owned a gun. Were they powerless? Were their ideas? Not everything that matters, can be measured.
Istvan, I wholeheartedly agree with your last statement. I am not a reductionist, nor am I am anti-metaphysical. I just have an opinion about what comes first on this planet. And on that we apparently disagree.
albion and istvan the mad are both right. While I'm not sure they'll accept my proposed rapprochement, I'll at least give it a try.
It's quite true, as albion said, that socio-political elites derive their power from "the ownership of weapons, trade networks and media conglomerates". Thankfully it's also true, as istvan said, that power (social influence) can derive from other sources. In the US, for example, the civil rights movement achieved not only moral victories but material ones too, and did it without weapons, trade networks or media conglomerates.
Simply put, malevolent power derives from violence and the manufacture of fear; benevolent power derives from compassion and the spread of enlightenment. If it sounds a bit Manichean, just omit the supernatural, and what remains is the truth of the matter.
"We're really talking here about the persistance of archetypes, and those do have power"
St Paul's cathedral in London was a temple to Diana originally, and Diana (not the recent one! (though maybe that's a good topic for some synchonicious speculation)) was just a Roman imposition on the worship of Bree (hence Britain - Bree-tain, people of Bree). As recently as the 1600s women used to hug the pillars in the old St Paul's (before it burnt down in the great fire) in the hope of that it would make them pregnant.
"St Paul's cathedral in London was a temple to Diana originally"
St. Paul's was built on the site of a Roman temple to Diana; it was never itself a temple to Diana. Who would have commissioned Sir Christopher Wren to build such a thing?
"Diana...was just a Roman imposition on the worship of Bree (hence Britain - Bree-tain, people of Bree)."
The first Celtic people to settle in Britain spoke a P-Celtic language and called themselves 'Priteni' or 'Pritani'. The name 'Britain' is probably derived from 'Priteni', which was later borrowed into Latin in the form 'Britannia' and from there into modern European languages. Bree? Bree-tain? Sheesh!
Bismillahirrohmannirrokhim ..................
1111111111111111111111111
Wasir atau dikenal juga dengan ambeien merupakan salah satu jenis penyakit
obat sipilis raja singa obat sipilis raja singa manjur obat sipilis raja singa herbal obat sipilis raja singa alami obat sipilis raja singa mujarab obat sipilis raja singa herbal manjur
Post a Comment
<< Home