"God Bless Canada"
Used to have a country but they sold it down the river
Like a repossessed farm auctioned off to the highest bidder - Bruce Cockburn
I'm still finding my post-election legs here. (That was a long night, and a tall bottle.) So forgive a little more indulgent Canadiana, and consider this a place-holder until I can get it together for a proper post.
Now, about what the hell is going on up here.
The Conservatives have formed a "safe" government on a short leash, that in the long term may prove the most disastrous outcome. Their weak minority will force them, if they're smart (and they are, now) to moderate their agenda; actually bringing it more into line with the centrist cooings Stephen Harper was making during the campaign. Breathing space for everyone, but it just means we're in a pot that's being brought to a boil. Some won't notice until they smell the garlic butter.
Canadian minority governments typically survive about 18 months. This provides a perfect window for our increasingly aggressive corporatist media to burnish Harper's image, and for voters to feel the slight benefit of tax cuts without yet feeling the pain of cuts to social services. (And of course this is how Canadian social services will be gutted. The Conservatives must say the right thing - that they will defend public healthcare, employment insurance and the rest - all the while doing the wrong thing by emptying the Treasury. Then, well, their hands will be tied: just the way they like it.)
The Conservatives will need to broker deals with one of the three parties to their left, but that may not be as difficult as it appears. Though the Bloc Quebecois has a progressive platform it has also strong nativist elements to which Harper's vision of a devolved federal state will easily appeal. (A note about the Green Party, which won no seats but took 4% of the vote. Our Greens have become a stalking horse of the Right, led by a former Conservative and his team, which exists now only to siphon naive votes away from Left candidates in close races.)
Something else to expect during the minority tenure is Harper's drawing a target on Canada's back and then claiming it is only the Conservatives who are "strong on security." This could be precipitated by a world event (say, the forthcoming and potentially unconventional attack on Iran), Harper's hellbent march into the endless "war on terror," followed closely by a Bali bombing-like, this time it's personal attack on a soft Canadian target. If it sounds like something out of John Howard's playbook, it is. Howard's national campaign director, Brian Loughnane, is also advising the Canadian Conservatives.
(Incidentally the Liberals, like Liberals do, tried to have it both ways in power by making a rhetorical flourish of sitting out Iraq while quietly bloodying Canada's hands in Haiti by participating in the criminal abduction of Aristide and the crushing of Lavalas.)
It's interesting to note that, the weekend before the election, 60 Minutes gushed over the environmental catastrophe - and economic fallacy - of Alberta's oil sands: "the reserves are so vast in the province of Alberta that they will help solve America’s energy needs for the next century.... Within a few years, the oil sands are likely to become more important to the United States than all the oil that comes to us from Saudi Arabia."
How propitious, then, that a right-wing Albertan who closes his speeches with the strangely uncanadian "God Bless Canada" has just been elected Prime Minister.
32 Comments:
Band:DISTURBED
LYRICS - "Shout 2000"
(chorus)
Shout
Shout
Let it all out
These are the things I can do without
Come on
I'm talking to you
So come on
[repeat]
In violent times...
You shouldn't have to sell your soul
In black and white...
They really really ought to know
(just don't know)
Those one-trick minds...
Who took you for a working whore
Kiss them goodbye...
You shouldn't have to jump for joy
(jump jump jump jump jump)
You shouldn't have to (shout) for joy(shout)
(chorus)
They give you life...
and in return you gave them hell
As cold as ice(not witch your ice ice baby)
I hope we live to tell the tale
I hope we live to (shout) the tale(shout)
(chorus)
Will you never shout?
I feel as though you're never gonna let it all out
Will you never shout?
I feel as though I know
you're never gonna let it all out
will you never shout?
I feel as though I know you're never gonna let it.....
And when you've taken down your guard...
If I could change your mind...
I'd really love to break your heart!
(break break break break break)
I'd really love to (shout) your heart(shout) let it all out.
I'd really love to
(shout shout)
Come on let me shout shout let me
Come on let me shout shout
Come on let me shout shout let me
Come on let me shout shout
Sorry Jeff.
Us American liberals feel your pain.
Hopefully in our lifetimes we can turn things around, but who the hell really knows WHAT is going on these days.
Does believing that "special" words, symbols and rituals in themselves can actually impose change upon the physical universe reveal a shortcoming or deficiancy in our consciousness that is being exploited to manipulate our behaviour by those who are aware of this condition?
The deficiency seems to me to be something along the lines of continually conflating ideas about things for things-in-themselves. The diea of freedom thus supplants actual liberty, the idea of a free market is used to justify tariffs and licenses, the idea of safety motivates efforts which do not improve actual safety.
In the pathological case, a theory of the world is taken as reality; when the observable real world does not match the model, it is taken to be "incorrect", and must be altered by force to fit the model (c.f. the Stalinist attempt to bring Marx's utopia to life.)
I do not know why this should be, but it seems to be a universal phenomenon that I continually note in myself as well as others.
There seems to be some element of self-identification at work here; the self takes such ideas as relating to itself in some way ("I am free", "I am in control", "I am safe.") The strength of this bond seems to correlate with the degree to which the idea is given precedence over the observed phenomenon.
I think you made a mistake in the article. Most will actually lick their lips when they smell the garlic butter and wonder what's for dinner.
A couple of years ago (pre-Iraq and $25 p/b oil), I had a chance encounter on a golf course with Chevron-Texaco's
manager of its oil sands project. I manage investments for institutions and have noticed over the decades that the Republicans only win when oil is high or rising: Red states sell energy to Blue States. In the run-up to war the neocons said Iraq's "freed" oil revenues would pay for the war and the rebuilding of the country -- prices would fall -- as Iraq, 3rd largest in world reserves kifted output. Someone at headquaters in San Ramon, CA must have had reason to think prices would be up, because they knew something different about Iraq after Saddam, perhaps thru a discussion with Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force. Just intuition but I was already long energy stocks and adding daily during the FL recount!
What in the world is happening when even our neighbor to the north makes a political right turn??
I do not know what to say, although as a member of the Green Party down south of the border, I hope the statement about 4% and naivetee does not apply to the States or is driven by the bitter response to the results. My rationale is that the two party system has proven woefully inadequate to represent the spectrum of views on issues, and to maintain it is naive. Canada still may have one up on us with the Parliamentary structure, despite periodic gridlock. Plus I simply do not like the Democratic candidates with a few exceptions, such as the oft-portrayed "wacky hippie" Kucinich from my own state, and I like the Republicans even less.
Are there any ties to the American Republican machine and this election? Also were there any vote count mishaps?
The Cloak and Dagger site, out of Toronto, has noted that animated features in the Toronto Star and National Post may be hinting on something happening in Toronto, perhaps around Scotia Plaza... let's hope that doesn't happen.
Looking at the whole thing from the U.S. it seemed right from the start when we (in the U.S.) first heard of Paul Martin that he was in the Bush gang. Then he takes over and starts mouthing some anti-American platitudes here and there to give himself just enough credibility.
But then he seemed to DO nothing more than sap the spirit of the left (sounds like John Kerry).
It seems like he was a stalking horse for the Neocon takeover of Canada all along.
"How is it that a toad this large comes to stand in front of us?"
- Chinese proverb.
Let's hope that Canada is not playing Austria in America's current re-enactment of the Third Reich.
I find it surprising that you all are even talking about liberals and conservatives, etc. as if they actually made a difference. The secret decisions made behind closed doors in secrecy is what's running the world. The ceremony of elections is merely an illusion. When I voted for Kerry in the last US election, I knew 'intuitively' that it made no difference whatsoever. But, I got somewhat caught up in the "hope" that my involvement would mean something. That was after 10 years of not voting because of the same "intuition".
As far as the interesting story by mako about the beautiful sunset, I've busted my head against the proverbial brick wall trying to get sheeple to "see" the chemtrails in the sky spewed out by black ops military jets to create cloudcover in their weather manipulation strategy. If I hear one more time, "oh, those are just ice crystals - contrails - vapor trails" - I'll just scream. Sheeple are trained not to see or hear or speak what's absolutely right in front of their nose.
one of the other anon's said:
"Anonymous said...
Let's hope that Canada is not playing Austria in America's current re-enactment of the Third Reich..."
That does seem to be the plan. Actually, I would predict that Canada will be invaded by international NORTHCOM/NATO troops. Same as Hurricane Katrina coastline.
Though the Canadian government is going to join in willingly, particluarly [1] now that Canada is under NORAD's NORTHCOM, and [2] Canada is in deliberations to give over control of its missile arsenal to a group "US/Canada" planning agency. In other words, come the next terror strike 'in Canada', NORTHCOM is activated--a war theatre for NORAD that covers without bordern issues the Mexican, Canadaian, and United States territories.
NORTHCOM by the way was what was responsible for importing its international troop contingents as a test into Hurricane Katrina damage in Louisiana.
NORTHCOM is really mostly NATO troops under a different North American name...
And the 9-11 head of NORAD [General Eberhart who stood down, and was later REWARDED instead of punished with a larger responsibility of being first head of NORTHCOM, and he is now retired] was of course what was responsible for the standdown of the Pentagon and WTC hits, which have led us to this American Anschluss off all of North America as well as a large portion of the Middle East.
Title: CFR Plan to Eliminate US-Mex.-Canada Borders, to sync w/post 9-11 NORTHCOM/NATO occupation
Author: repost
Date: 2004.11.17 09:48
Description: There has been a great deal of very aristocratic, corporate, and military integrating going on internationally post 9-11 to destroy all democratic feedback against their transnational corporate regime in three major states of North America: US, Canada, and Mexico. See all three links for the continuities. I would have chosen this to go under "forest defense" and "energy & nuclear" categories as well, so read for that. COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: "A tri-national task force, chaired by former Liberal Party deputy prime minister John Manley, with the full backing of all three [unrepresentative state corporatist] governments, is plotting the roadmap for this new, bolder alliance meant to compete with the European Union. [so they say...there is always someone else to blame for their desire to removing any local democratic feedback to the corporate elites...] William Weld, former governor of Massachusetts and Pedro Aspe, former Mexican finance minister, join Manley on the panel that reports directly to the Council on Foreign Relations." "The "NAFTA-plus" plan has also been referred to as "deep integration." Skeptics see it as a plan to eliminate national sovereignty and erode the American concept of representative government accountable to the people under the framework of the Constitution. Discussions so far indicate that Canada, under the new agreement, would immediately sign on to the U.S. strategic missile defense initiative. Canada would also make its vast lumber resources available to the U.S. [degradative corporations] and Mexican markets and provide more open access [and destruction of environmental laws regarding] to the northern neighbor's oil, natural gas and hydro-electric power resources. KISSINGER APPEARS HERE: "Other members of the task force include: Canadian Finance Minister Michael Wilson and Nelson Cunningham of Henry Kissinger's consulting firm, Kissinger McLarty Associates."
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/303653.shtml
Title: U.S. invaded by Mex.,Canada, Dutch, German, Russian: making international loopholes as the exceptions to the domestic Posse Commutatus Act...
Author: northcom quoter
Date: 2005.09.18 06:35
Description: "Hey, no one told us international NATO military guys at Northcom we can't use foreign troops to invade--to get around the American Posse Commutatus ban against domestic troops...." Actually, Northcom has a well placed list of exceptions on the Northcom.mil website, already planned out: here's a list of already set up "exceptions" they mention to the Posse Commutatus Act. Expect these "exceptions" to be utilized by Northcom--or invented--as a context for further internationalized martial law in the U.S.A. "as the HAARP turns." However, Americans are well within their rights to conduct immediate citizens arrests of major Northcom figures, and these military figures get two years jail automatically: Section 1385 of Title 18, United States Code (USC), states: “Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.” Since Congress DID NOT authorize this action--the only way it could fathomably occur--and it doesn't fit in their legal exceptions mentioned below we are to conclude fairly that Northcom's actions after Hurricane Katrina are a breach of the Posse Commutatus Act as well as a treasonous act combined, and we may conduct citizens arrest of major Northcom figures RIGHT NOW. Who wants to organize the PR for that?
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/09/325083.shtml
I should toss in a couple more words regarding US invasions of Canada. First, there's a province of people who apparently barely consider themselves Canadian, preferring to think they have more in common with France than the British Commonwealth nations. They have been militant in the past and would likely be quite unhappy to be occupied by right-wing Anglos from down south.
Second, recall that Newfoundland did not join Canada until 1948, and although I have no personal experience there, this makes me wonder whether they consider themselves culturally more British than other provinces in Canada, relating to my other point--Unless it was a "silent" and non-militaristic "occupation," would the British Commonwealth not be forced to provide defense for Canada in case of hostile actions against them? This would create a conflict within NATO and also shake up international politics.
As usual, I find myself arguing that given the way things are now and assuming nothing changes radically and unexpectedly in the near future, predictions of US invasion or occupation of Canada are premature. On the other hand, I do recall rumors of a couple western provinces considering applying to become states in case of a certain referendum passing around 1995...
Anonymous @ 2:12 said...
As far as the interesting story by mako about the beautiful sunset, I've busted my head against the proverbial brick wall trying to get sheeple to "see" the chemtrails in the sky spewed out by black ops military jets to create cloudcover in their weather manipulation strategy.
Right on. I'm glad somebody said it.
I've posted here before about this, and I'm going to do it again:
You can stop the chemtrail spraying program over your skies!
You can make a simple substance from Bondo resin, free metal shavings from a machine shop, and small quartz crystal chips (poured into muffin molds) which, when tactically deployed, will restore the sky to the deep blue with puffy white clouds you remember from childhood.
Sound crazy? Thousands of people all over the world have done it and are doing it to restore energetic balance and drive the parasites out of their communities.
The positive weather changes have even made news stories in such areas as Toronto, Death Valley CA, and South Africa.
The substance is referred to as "orgonite", as it is based on Wilhelm Reich's orgone research. You can read all about it at orgonite.info, an informational site which explains what it is, what it does, how it's being used, and -- most importantly -- how to make it.
I urge everyone here who is aware of and concerned about chemtrails to read over the site and, if it makes sense to you, go out and make orgonite, buy ready-made orgonite, or at least request a free "peace" of orgonite from FreeOrgonite.com.
This is the only thing aside from concentrated mental effort which has demonstrated a consistent ability to disperse chemtrails and HAARP clouds. This is very important!
Orgonite feels great, helps you sleep better, makes houseplants and gardens flourish while needing less water, and numerous other things that positive etheric energy does. Check it out!
-Peace
tIME TO LOOK INTO BUYING ALBERTA OIL SANDS COMPANYS STOCK. lOOKS LIKE THEY ARE HAVING DIFFICULTY EVEN FINDING EMPLOYEE HOUSING IN FORT MC MURRAY SO THEY ARE LOOKING AT SINKING IN 5 BILLION INTO EDMONTON FOR THIS REASON AND EXPANDING THE CITY TO ACCOMEDATE. a) I DON'T THINK IT WILL COST THAT MUCH b) I BET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL OFFER IT AS SUPPORT AND GROWTH.
TIME TO INVEST!!
Canada's resources are unbelievably enormous, we are a north american stratagey. Keep Canada quite and it's resources. We could supply fresh water, natural gas, oil, agriculture, etc. A number one gold mine we have it all. Best thing for north america, keep it quite put in a leader that can control it bl;ah blah blah. We are part of a hundred year plan, a plan for survival. What happens when the rest of the world runs out? Thats why Canada has a tiny population ratio to our land. Its controlled for a reason.
Good luck to our kids.
My condolences. That's all I can say. This is like some dang infection. I'm sure they will drag all you peace lovin' Candadians into the next debacle over in Iraq, since our troops are probably depleted. I am so sorry to hear this. I will still visit, but I think I'll set my sights on Venezuela.
I thought I was scared enough already. I managed to calm myself down. Then I read this post.
Maybe I was right the first time. Canada really is gone, or about to be.
Jeff,
Welcome to Texas.
-J.D.
It's still a minortiy goverment, people. Of course minorities like Bush or Harper in power do terrible things....
What Did Stephen Harper
Actually Win?
By John Chuckman
2-5-2006
There has been a lot of noise about the victory of Stephen Harper, leader of Canada's new Conservative party, but just what did he win?
Votes in the recent election for progressive parties - Liberals, New Democrats, and Bloc Quebecois (quite progressive on social issues) - went from 64.8% in the 2004 election to 58.2% in 2006, a handsome majority that would be rated a landslide in an American presidential election.
Harper's minority-government party went from 29.6% of the vote in 2004 to 36.3% in 2006, hardly a mandate for change, and certainly not revolutionary change. Even Conservative diehards, while blowing about victory, were perceptibly disappointed: you could almost hear the breath whistling through their teeth. The new Conservatives remain decidedly a minority party.
When we consider that the Liberals were divided by their change in leadership, plagued by scandals and rumors of scandals, and ran an unappealing campaign, the still-small vote for Conservatives gains is telling.
Stephen Harper's muzzling of the Conservatives' Social-Neanderthal Wing, largely resident in Alberta, during the 2006 campaign also must be taken into account. In 2004, several of Harper's religious-right throwbacks made embarrassing public statements about social policy, reminding Canadians voters that they might just be letting a gang of Jehovah's Witnesses into their living rooms. Harper silenced these people in 2006.
Harper himself spoke more calmly than he did in 2004, when he sometimes resembled a flat-footed, angry kid, and I truly believe Canadians, determined to punish the Liberals, with their usual sensible and practical approach to politics, realized that a minority Harper government represents little threat.
Harper simply will not be in a position to change any of the major social policies most hated in heavily American-influenced Alberta. Even if Harper were in a better position to try, Canada's enlightened courts stand ready to strike down any poorly-conceived legislation. In some cases, notably that of gay marriage, it was the courts themselves that brought important human-rights issues to the point where legislation was required.
Harper has already spoken of the courts. I don't know why it is, but right-wingers always castigate courts for doing their jobs. Thomas Jefferson, the intellectual godfather of the American extreme right, absolutely hated federal courts, and it had nothing to do with democracy because Jefferson didn't believe in democracy, and his Virginia was a place were a tiny portion of the population white, male owners of substantial property (roughly one percent of the population, even after the Revolution) - got to vote.
Jefferson was ready to have Virginia separate, more than half a century before the Civil War, over the issue of the Supreme Court's interpreting the Bill of Rights. Jefferson thought the words were just fine as advertising, but any attempt at their enforcement threatened his comfortable world as slaveholder, local aristocrat, and narrow-minded states-righter. His view reflected his own life in which he wrote many high-sounding phrases as a false legacy while living off the avails of slavery and believing blacks and women and others were not suited to play a role in government. A toned-down version of this nasty American intellectual heritage crops up in Alberta frequently, and Harper sometimes mimics it, though admittedly with a less hateful tone than that of its chief American exponent, ex-cockroach exterminator and big-time political money-launderer, Tom Delay of Texas.
The new Conservatives did pick up their first seats in Quebec, but despite Quebec's reputation as a progressive society, we should not forget that it was not all that long ago a base for social credit, that strange amalgam of conservatism, rural values, and financial mysticism. The Bloc Quebecois stretched hard to sweep the province over Liberal scandal but only succeeded in sounding tired as well as highlighting its disingenuousness over the connection between it and separatism. Who else was there to turn to? The NDP is viewed as a boring troop of Anglo Boy Scouts in Quebec.
So long as Harper sticks to reforms like sensible new rules for government accountability, no one can object. Other relatively minor changes, likely to be supported by one or another party, will do no harm.
There is one change that will be regrettable if Harper can get support from another party in parliament for it. The Liberals did a lot of work at building a genuine national day-care system, an important concept in a society where more than three-quarters of women work.
In places like the violence-plagued Jamaican areas of Toronto, real day-care is badly needed and the city has planned, based on agreements with the Liberals, to create many new sites. But Harper's campaign promise is instead for a monthly cheque, kind of a super baby-bonus, although not large enough to buy day-care for anyone. A cheque will be welcomed by anyone getting it, and will be especially so by Harper's stay-at-home, mothers-in-apron crowd, but will it do anything to create good day-care where it is most needed? Does any honest person believe that a cheque will do what a well-organized, easily-accessed system would do, especially where serious problems already involve poor parenting?
The greatest threat Harper's minority represents is agreement with the Bloc Quebecois to de-centralizing programs with cash flowing to the provinces. The reason for the Bloc's support of such programs is obvious.
I do not oppose specific new agreements where old ones are out of date, as for example involving disproportionate impacts of immigration on a city like Toronto. But wholesale changes are fraught with difficulties. You only have to look at Bush's colossal blunders in reordering American taxes, depleting the American treasury while rewarding segments of society with windfall wealth, and yet spending like a drunken sailor on the things he thinks important. Gigantic tax cuts like Bush's have huge long-term implications for a society, many of them unpleasant or destructive.
Just one example of such destructive tax changes, perhaps many Canadians do not appreciate, is the tremendous burden that has fallen on American local governments, many of which are poor because they are home mainly to poor people. Property taxes on homes in many U.S. cities have reached extortionate levels, further driving people to distant suburbs and encouraging mindless sprawl and the choking off of healthy cities. Another example is multilevel income taxes in the U.S. with individual states generally having their own separate systems, rules, and forms - this even involves some people filing and paying income taxes to more than one state. Many American cities, too, now levy taxes we do not associate with urban jurisdiction.
Canada already is a more de-centralized society, dangerously so in some aspects. The informal coalition of a Quebec separatist party and the implicitly separatist sentiments of Harper's Alberta crowd is a risky combination for the nation's future health and stability. This is exactly the path by which Quebec separatism is truly dangerous: federal politicians making gradual cozy arrangements which weaken the bonds of national identity. Any referendum on separation with a clear question, under prevailing arrangements in Canada, cannot produce a majority in Quebec, much less a convincing majority. The Bloc's behavior and results in this election, even at a time of heightened resentment over past federal Liberal behavior, demonstrates this forcefully, as do endless polls over many years, and as does the last referendum with its impossibly-ambiguous and complex question. Even were it possible to imagine a referendum producing a yes, the years of detailed negotiation over assets and liabilities required to sort out a fair divorce would soon exhaust the momentum for change.
In Alberta, we already have a government that doesn't know what to do with its new-found wealth. What on earth would it do with more? It's all code for a form of separatism, a severe weakening of the national government. If you listen to some Alberta voices, you hear silly things like you might expect from a pimply teenage rock star that has overnight become a multimillionaire. Alberta has simply lucked out in the tarsands with world oil prices exploding. None of the province's new affluence is due to the wisdom of its premier, Ralph Klein, or to the philosophy of Harper's crowd. Klein balanced the budget with an unanticipated flood of cash, something with which any premier could balance a budget. Were world oil prices to collapse, all of the braggadocio over right-wing intellectual nonsense like "not being afraid of excellence in Alberta" would dry up like prairie grass in a drought.
Important social programs that almost define the character of Canada need to apply, with accommodating variations, coast to coast, and they need the resources from wealthier parts of the country to assist the poorer parts. When we seriously depart from this principle, Canada will have become the United States North.
I hope the Liberals take their rebuke by the electorate seriously, making it abundantly clear before the next election that the party is thoroughly clean and repentant. That and a sympathetic new leader, perhaps an altogether fresh voice, are the sine qua non of coming back before the Conservative-separatist axis inflicts too much damage on the country.
Harper's almost wet-eyed puppy attitude towards the United States is dangerous over any extended period, especially at a time of American unapologetic imperial hubris, the kind of thing that makes the ongoing, pointless destruction in Iraq possible. If the Liberals do things right, Harper will not have the time.
We can expect, in the not-too-distant future, American-led action against Iran. With America's over-stretched military forces, the bad taste in many Congressmen's mouths of a unbelievably costly, failed policy in Iraq, plus new lows in Bush's popularity, actual invasion seems unlikely. However, severe sanctions and bombing or missile attacks seem likely. The price of oil will soar yet again since Iran is one of the world's great crude oil reservoirs, sending a great, unpleasant shock through the economies of Western nations. Islamic countries will yet again feel insultingly stung by the unbalanced justice of American policy. Will Prime Minister Harper embrace such a de-stabilizing policy that is not in Canada's long-term interest but is solely guided by America's will to re-order the planet?
http://www.rense.com/
general69/whatdidstephen.htm
Orgonite..you do get around. Same...different pile?
I'm concerned that Martin and his hook with Maurice Strong has been a stalking horse as well. Witness this commitment of the Canadian army in Afghanistan. We didn't hear anything about thousands of Canadians fighting whatever in the middle east and here and now Mar. 5, 2006, they are bringing home the body bags.
And I though I was verbose
Apabila anda sedang mencari pengobatan kutil kelamin untuk pria maupun wanita segera kunjungi kami http://obatkutilkelaminwanita.blogdetik.com cara mengobati kutil kelamin pada wanita tanpa harus menggunakan operasi cukup dengan menggunakan obat khusus kutil kelamin paling manjur dari klinik de nature manjurserta sangat aman untuk ibu hamil
Penyakit kencing nanah bisa disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor seperti seks bebas, penularan, virus hpv, lingkungan, gaya hidup dan lainnya, Maka dari itu kita harus waspada dengan penyakit kencing nanah ini, karena penyakit kencing nanah sangatlah berbahaya, Namun untuk anda yang menderita penyakit kencing nanah, maka anda tidak perlu khawatir,
MANTAB * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
Bismillaahirrohmaanirrokhiim ???????????????????????????????????
MANTAB *************************************
Bismillahirrohmannirrokhim ...............................
???????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????
1111111111111111111111111
Post a Comment
<< Home